No Drumlins

Honestly…Who names a hill a drumlin?

Archive for September, 2006

NFL Picks, Week 4

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 30, 2006

For entertainment purposes only. Picks are against the spread, straight up winners are in bold.

NY Jets (+9) over Indianapolis (W, 28-31)
Baltimore (+2.5) over San Diego (W, 17-16)
Minnesota (+1) over Buffalo (L, 12-17)
Dallas (-9) over Tennessee (W, 45-14)
Kansas City (-7) over San Francisco (W, 41-0)
New Orleans (+7) over Carolina (W, 18-21)
Atlanta (-7) over Arizona (W, 32-10)
Miami (-3.5) over Houston (L, 15-17)
St. Louis (-5.5) over Detroit (W, 41-34)
Cincinnati (-6) over New England (L, 13-38)
Jacksonville (-3) over Washington (L, 30-36)
Cleveland (-3) over Oakland (T, 24-21)
Chicago (-3) over Seattle (W, 37-6)
Philadelphia (-11) over Green Bay (W, 31-9)

Against the Spread

LAST WEEK   7- 5- 2  .571
TO DATE    26-18- 2  .587
THIS WEEK   9- 4- 1  .679
SEASON     35-22- 3  .608

Straight Up

LAST WEEK   9- 5  .643
TO DATE    30-16  .652
THIS WEEK  10- 4  .714
SEASON     40-20  .667

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Mazzarella inserts himself into guv race

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 29, 2006

Leominster mayor Dean Mazzarella is back at it again. I guess it’s been a while since he’s been on the front page, so he dropped a dime to the Telegram and Gazette and the Sentinel and Enterprise to express concern over Deval Patrick’s decade-old statements on convicted rapist Ben LaGuer’s attempts to be freed.

Now, my first reaction was that the mayor is just looking for a reason to get in the papers again. Let’s face it, the guy likes the publicity. No event is small enough for a presser. You may recall, he called a news conference in the spring to rebut a TV mini-series about the bird flu. But others wonder if he’s trying to knock Patrick down a peg in his run against Kerry Healey. Another theory suggests that Mazzarella is providing cover for Mitt Romney’s controversial appointment of Assistant DA James Lemaire to a judgeship.

Frankly, I think it’s a combination of three factors:

1. Mayor Mazzarella strongly believes that LaGuer is guilty and he’s genuinely concerned that a Patrick win could be a factor in the effort to overturn his conviction. Mazzarella was a rookie police officer on the Leominster police force when the victim in the case was raped and beaten and was one of the first officers on the scene. In the recent interview with the Sentinel, he remembered “looking in the back of an ambulance at someone who was beaten for 12 hours. You know, it was a pretty violent crime.” I’m sure my opinion would be heavily influenced by witnessing a victim in that state of distress.

2. The mayor has decided to support Lt. Governor Healey, and he knows he has an issue that could resonate with voters. Let’s face it, to anyone who doesn’t read much past the headlines or the first couple of paragraphs, the idea of Patrick supporting the efforts of a convicted rapist will just reinforce Healey’s attack that Patrick is “soft on crime.” It doesn’t really matter what the details of the case are, or the reasons behind Patrick’s position a decade ago if folks won’t research an issue deeply enough to understand all of the elements.

In his interview with the Sentinel the mayor said he voted for Chris Gabrieli and presented his vote as a sign of his independence (He campaigned for Romney four years ago). But it could also be that Mazzarella is lining up behind Healey, as I expect many independents in Leominster who voted for Gabrieli and Reilly will. It wouldn’t shock me to find that Mazzarella is being a covert surrogate for the Healey campaign in an area of the state which could be the key to the race.

3. The Mayor sees an opportunity to increase his profile. As I mentioned previously, the Mayor likes to be in the news. Certainly because of his involvement in the case, he has an interest in the case, and as the leader of the city, he has a bully pulpit.

I think it’s instructive that he called reporters from the two local papers to express his reservations about Patrick’s position. If he were only worried about Patrick’s statements, I’m sure he could have called Patrick privately to discuss the issue. I mean, he is the mayor of a very important city not only in the region, but to the campaign. I’m sure Patrick would have either returned his call or arranged to meet with him when he was in the area. Add to that the fact that this issue was covered in the papers a month ago during the primary and the mayor had the opportunity then to address it if he wished.

I’d say the mayor had a reason to air his concerns publicly. I’m just not sure which reason was his most important.

Update: Further demonstrating my point about basking in the limelight, Mazzarella has been hitting the Boston talk radio circuit.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Where is Rep. Flanagan’s campaign?

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 28, 2006

In less than six weeks, Leominster voters will decide whether or not to send freshman state representative Jennifer Flanagan back to the state house for another term. I support Jen Flanagan, and I want her to be reelected. But I am beginning to wonder if I am more interested in her reelection than she is.

Since the end of April I have written about the race a handful of times. It’s certainly not the most important thing on my mind. But at least I’ve been on the bandwagon. Rep. Flanagan’s campaign website has not been updated since June 6. The only event on her site’s “events” list is a campaign kickoff scheduled for February 26. Her biography doesn’t even mention her time as a state representative among her qualifications.

Maybe she’s got everything under control, but I’m skeptical.

City councilor Claire Freda, who left the Democratic Party and her seat on the Democratic State Committee in February to run against Flanagan as an independent, is as cliched as a candidate could be. She offers nothing. She officially kicked off her campaign Tuesday with these gems:

  • “I won’t serve the special interest groups; I’ll serve the residents of Leominster.”
  • “[I'll] make Leominster a priority.”
  • “As a state representative, it’s my job to bring money back from the state to the city.”

And my favorite:

  • “[The Democratic Party] was not the party I grew up with, Family values were falling apart.”

Which essentially means “I can’t get enough votes in a Democratic party, I’m bored with being a city councilor, and since I’m against gay marriage I’ll run as an independent. Did I mention I’m from Leominster?”

Despite no compelling reason for her candidacy, Freda is popular enough in town that she went into September with more cash on hand than Flanagan. She only lost the Democratic primary to Flanagan by 835 votes, and if she keeps one-third of the Democrats in November, the race will be no better than a toss-up.

Essentially, Flanagan had better be prepared for a fight. She will need to make a compelling case for reelection, and frankly, I have yet to see a sign of it.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

George Allen makes me laugh

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 27, 2006

Not really. In fact I find the senator’s use of racial slurs (including the recent “macaca”) and his history of bigotry offensive. But Slate has decided to have a little fun at his expense with the George Allen Insult Generator. Some of these are quite funny.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Belichick for Secretary of State

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 25, 2006

Think Condoleeza Rice and the neo-cons take a hard line? Bet they haven’t discussed the possibility of China dissolving in the next 11 months. Bill Belichick:

That stuff is so far in the future that I don’t know if China will be there a year from now.

Now that’s taking a hard line.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Staying out of jail, and other thoughts on the tonight’s debate

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 25, 2006

Let me get this confession out of the way: I have driven a car with an expired registration. I think it’s important to state that up front since Christy Mihos proposed tonight that driving without a license or registration should be a felony. I’ll be voting against Christy since I don’t want to go to jail.

Oh, and get Shonda Schilling off my TV.

In other news, tonight’s debate was good for Deval Patrick. Patrick came into the night riding the momentum of a surprisingly strong victory in the Democratic primary and a stunning 64-25 lead over Kerry Healey in the first poll after the primary. I wondered if he would play it safe and defend his lead or go for the kill. He got the best of both worlds as he was able to reaffirm the positions where he is on the side of the majority, let the issues which work against him get lost in all of the crosstalk, and sit back while Christy Mihos and Grace Ross led the attack on Kerry Healey.

The only thing I heard from Patrick which was “new” (at least to me) was the charge that the Romney-Healey administration had raised “taxes and fees” by over $900 million dollars during their time in office. Frankly, that’s not a lot of money and not a big deal, but it is clear that Patrick will be touting that number to try to neutralize Healey’s attacks on his position.

Patrick didn’t score any points against Healey, but Healey took her lumps as Ross and Mihos pounded her on essentially everything the Romney administration has done over the years. In fact, Patrick appeared pretty reasonable in agreeing with Healey on a couple of items when she would attempt to rebut an attack from the other two candidates.

Mihos especially led the charge, attacking Healey on the Big Dig and budget issues. He pounded away on leadership issues, reminding Healey that she and Romney have had four years to make the changes that she is proposing, and have failed on all accounts. As a former member of the Turnpike Authority who spoke against the excesses of the Big Dig and was fired by a Republican governor, he has credibility on the issue that the other three candidates don’t have, and his command of the issue and the passion with which he discussed it were his strong points.

However that passion caused him problems when he was discussing other issues, he often lost track of his points as he spoke, repeating himself in some instances and changing subjects abruptly in others. It was as though he was so excited that he forgot what he was saying. In fact, he probably came across worse on the radio than on TV. I heard the first 10 minutes of the debate while driving home from work and had an impression of a wildly gesturing, wide-eyed lunatic. On TV, he seemed energetic but composed.

Ross surprised me a little. While she seemed disinterested through much of the first part of the debate, she was genuinely passionate and articulate when speaking about economic issues and the challenges facing urban and working families. The election won’t be won or lost on those issues, and Ross doesn’t have the money, organization, or personal presence to make much of a dent. But I’d be surprised if she isn’t able to claim the 3% of the vote necessary to qualify the Green-Rainbow party for the ballot in 2008. In fact, I wouldn’t be stunned if she finished third, ahead of Mihos.

Healey seems a little more impressive to me each time I hear her, but I think that’s because my expectations for her are low. For four years, I’ve only seen her stand next to the attention hog that is our governor, and I think I’ve subconsciously assumed that it has something to do with her inability to add anything. But she’s in a really tough spot. If she attacks Patrick as hard as I think she wants to, she will come across as being shrill, and it will play right into Patrick’s strategy of staying above the fray. If she defends herself against the attacks of Mihos and Ross, she runs the risk of getting bogged down arguing with opponents that can’t beat her. I’m not sure how she breaks out of that spot. I suppose her only chance is to attempt to bait Patrick into losing his cool, but we saw how that worked for Tom O’Reilly.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

On a more serious note…

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 24, 2006

Peek Freans are a very serious cookie.
Peek Freans.
If you’re a grown-up or plan to be one, you’ll know what we mean.
Peek Freans are a very serious cookie.
Peek Freans.

I was out of town on business last week and saw a box of Peek Freans. I haven’t been able to get their old jingle out of my head since. Just thought I’d share.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

NFL Picks, Week 3

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 23, 2006

For entertainment purposes only. Picks are against the spread, straight up winners are in bold.

Buffalo (-5.5) over N.Y. Jets (L, 20-28)
Pittsburgh (-1.5) over Cincinnati (L, 20-28)
Jacksonville (+7) over Indianapolis (T, 14-21)
Tennessee (+11) over Miami (W, 10-13)
Washington (-4) over Houston (W, 31-15)
Chicago (-3) over Minnesota (T, 19-16)
Carolina (-3) over Tampa Bay (L, 26-24)
Green Bay (+7) over Detroit (W, 31-24)
Baltimore
(-6.5) over Cleveland (L, 15-14)
Arizona (-4.5) over St. Louis (L, 14-16)
Seattle (-3.5) over N.Y. Giants (W, 42-30)
Philadelphia (-6) over San Francisco (W, 38-24)
Denver (+7) over New England (W, 17-7)
New Orleans (+3.5) over Atlanta

Against the Spread

LAST WEEK  12- 4- 0  .750
TO DATE    19-13- 0  .594
THIS WEEK   6- 5- 2  .538
SEASON     25-18- 2  .578

Straight Up

LAST WEEK  13- 3  .813
TO DATE    21-11  .656
THIS WEEK   8- 5  .615
SEASON     29-16  .644

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Patrick sweeps the North County

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 19, 2006

I’m not surprised that Patrick won, but I’m stunned both by the margin statewide and that he carried all of Northern Worcester County, despite our reputation as being more conservative than counties to the East and West (for instance, not one town in the North County went Democratic in the 2002 general election). I would have expected the region to go for Gabrieli or Reilly. But as we look at the results, Patrick not only won across the region, he earned majorities in many of them. Here are results from the surrounding towns:

CITY            PATRICK      GABRIELI     REILLY
Leominster      1,904  41%   1,523  33%   1,189  26%
Bolton            401  61%     161  25%      95  14%
Clinton           829  45%     451  24%     566  31%
Fitchburg       2,084  44%   1,433  30%   1,228  26%
Lancaster         488  61%     187  23%     131  16%
Princeton         315  59%     152  28%      67  13%
Sterling          427  51%     248  30%     161  19%

I’m stunned that Lancaster of all towns went that heavily for the most progressive candidate. To give you an idea how conservative Lancaster is (comparatively), Kerry only beat Bush by two votes in 2004. In fact, Sterling went for Bush two years ago, yet a majority of today’s voters went for the more liberal choice.

The question for the general election will be whether or not independents came out for Patrick and will stay with him for the general, or if the votes he received were exclusively from party activists. If it is the former, Patrick will win easily. If it is the latter, we’re in for a tough fight ahead.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Deval Patrick for Governor (and the rest of my ballot)

Posted by Lance Harris - Sterling DTC on September 18, 2006

In tomorrow’s primary, I will cast my vote for Deval Patrick to be the Democratic nominee for governor, and I urge you to join me in supporting his candidacy.

I had been struggling to decide between Patrick and Chris Gabrieli, and did not settle upon Patrick until late last week. If Gabrieli were to win the nomination I would be comfortable supporting him, as he and Patrick share similar views on many of the issues, but there are a handful of reasons I am choosing Patrick:

1. Patrick has the personality and passion to lead the state in a time of crisis. When two candidates share similar platforms, leadership ability becomes magnified as a trait. I believe Patrick has it. Patrick has shown an ability to inspire his supporters, to articulate his vision for the state, and has brought a passion to the campaign that Gabrieli lacks.

2. Patrick is a Democrat and is not afraid to run as a Democrat. As the campaign has neared primary day, Gabrieli has determined that his best chance to win is to appeal to independents and conservative Democrats. His question at last Wednesday’s debate asking Patrick whether or not he has taken positions in disagreement with the party platform was a disappointment. The candidates are running for the Democratic primary, and while Gabrieli and Tom Reilly emphasize their differences with the part, Patrick is unapologetic for his party affiliation and unafraid to run on Democratic values. If I wanted to elect a non-Democrat, I’d vote for Kerry Healey or Christy Mihos.

3. Patrick favors continuing in-state tuition for the children of illegal immigrants. I do not believe we should punish children for the choices of their parents. The state has a responsibility to provide for all of it’s residents, and in order to help qualified immigrant children fulfill their potential and be contributing members of society, we should provide them with the same opportunity as their American-born peers. Gabrieli’s opposition is ironic considering his reputation as an education guru of sorts, and it smacks of political opportunism.

4. Patrick is on the right side of the income tax debate. It has taken me all summer to warm to his position, as I am inclined to support an immediate income tax rollback because the voters approved the rollback as an initiative petition. While I think government by initiative petition is a bad way to do business, it is the law of the state. But I also believe that the state is not fiscally sound enough to absorb an immediate tax cut. It took all summer, but Patrick finally explained his position in terms I could agree with in the debate on Wednesday when he asked if residents would rather have $200 in your pocket, or save $500 in auto repairs because our roads and bridges are sound. He also explained that he supported the current law which provides for increases in personal exemptions and deductions before rolling back the income tax rate. Gabrieli’s plan is clever, but vague.

For Lieutenant Governor, I will vote for Worcester mayor Tim Murray. Generally, I do not believe that the nominee for LG has much effect on the race, but Murray could bring enough support from Central Mass. to keep Healey from sweeping the region (60 of 61 towns in Worcester. County voted for Romney in 2002), and in a close race, that could be the difference. I also believe that Central Mass. could use a strong advocate in the executive branch. I would also be comfortable with Andrea Silbert if Murray were not to win the nomination.

Incumbent Bill Galvin will get my vote for Secretary of State. Challenger John Bonifaz is essentially a one-issue candidate, emphasizing the need for election reform. While election reform is a major issue nationwide it has rarely been a problem in our state, to Secretary Galvin’s credit. I am disappointed that Galvin refused to debate his challenger, but not disappointed enough to change my vote.

I am reluctantly voting for Joe Early, Jr. for District Attorney. For nearly all of my adult life I have only voted for one republican in each election: whoever was running against retiring DA John Conte. Conte is a tired, reclusive, uncurious, uninterested, unaccountable old grump and should have retired decades ago.

I was hoping we’d have a better choice than the son of the quintessential congressional hack (Congressman Early nearly brought me to tears of laughter late one night when I caught him on C-Span defending himself against charges that he was involved in the congressional check-kiting scheme. He was pounding the lectern in the empty chamber, hollering in his Elmer Fudd affect “They’uh wunning like wats!” at his imaginary tormentors).

But it’s either him or Dan Shea, a carpetbagger from Texas who came to Worcester a decade ago, made a name defending victims of the Catholic church abuse scandal, and decided to run for office. At least Early is local and has worked as Asst. DA and Asst. Attorney General.

For Governor’s Council I will mark my ballot for Brian Buckley. I believe as Buckley does that lawyers should be evaluating and endorsing or rejecting the governor’s choices for judgeships. That leaves two candidates: Buckley and Brian D’Andrea. D’Andrea was a protege of Matt Amorello’s at the Turnpike Authority and is a hack’s hack. He will not receive my vote.

I am voting for Kathleen Reynolds Daigneault for Register of Deeds. (And shouldn’t that be Registrar of Deeds. Isn’t the register the physical book or binder in which the deed is filed.) I do not believe this should even be an elected office, but since it is I’m voting for Daigneault. She has been a perpetual candidate in Leominster and lost in the 2004 primary race for state representative. In fact, her supporters have recycled the campaign signs form that race, and added stickers with “Register of Deeds” to the sign posts. I don’t know if that is pitiful or a sign of perseverance, but it’s enough to get my vote.

All of the other races are uncontested, and while I usually leave my ballot blank if a race is uncontested, I will cast a vote for incumbent State Rep. Jennifer Flanagan. She is facing a strong challenge from opportunistic former-Democrat Claire Freda in the general election and I believe it will be helpful for Flanagan to gauge the level of her support coming out of the primary.

Tags:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »